Delhi High Court restores copyright infringement case at Delhi University
December 12, 2016, 19:00:06 CET | Wikinews

()
On Friday, the Delhi High Court restored a trial over claims of copyright infringement from photocopying of study materials for Delhi University (DU) course packs.

The charges of violation of copyright by DU's Rameshwari Photocopy Service was dismissed by justice Rajiv Sahan Endlaw in September saying there is no copyright infringement. But the bench of justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Yogesh Khanna said the case raises a "triable issue".

The bench restored the case, meanwhile still allowing the Rameshwari Photocopy Service to sell course packs containing copyrighted material of the publications of claimants Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press, and Taylor and Francis. The shop has been asked to report to the court every six months on what and how many course packs it photocopies and distributes.

The owner of the photocopy service shop, Dharam Pal Singh, said there was no reason for preparation of a course pack beyond the curriculum. He said the course pack had only readings the professors require or recommend; only important sections of the published books were photocopied.

"We declare that the law in India would not warrant an approach to answer the question by looking at whether the course pack has become a textbook, but by considering whether the inclusion of the copyrighted work in the course pack was justified by the purpose of the course pack", the bench said.

Dharam Pal said the students needed course packs because some books are limited by "availability, price and circulation". He said they are preserving data of some books last published more than half a century ago, and that some of the books cost more than ₹ 2000.

The High Court said it needs "expert evidence" to judge weather it is copyright violation or, as judge Sahani ruled, a fair use.

The case of copyright infringement was filled in the court in 2012. In September, Justice Endlaw said that, according to Section 52 of the Copyright Act, this instructional use did not amount to copyright infringement. He said, "Copyright, specially in literary works, is thus not an inevitable, divine, or natural right that confers on authors the absolute ownership of their creations." Endlaw added, "Copyright is intended to increase and not to impede the harvest of knowledge. It is intended to motivate the creative activity of authors and inventors in order to benefit the public."

Source: Wikinews
Share this article:
share article on facebook share article on twitter share article on google+ share article on tumblr share article on blogger share article on reddit

Send us your articles and web-novels!
comments powered by Disqus
Most popular


Recently Viewed:


Delhi High Court restores copyright infringement cas...

On Friday, the Delhi High Court restored a trial over claims of copyright infringement from ...


Poland: 27-year-old arrested in Stalowa Wola for sta...

Saturday, October 21, 2017  Crime and law Related articles 21 October 2017: Poland: 27-y...


UK Supreme Court require government to release Princ...

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom have concluded that the government must release a se...


Vatican to Palestinians: Remove us from your Draft R...

The draft Palestinian resolution, intended for presentation to the UN General Assembly, refe...


Scaffolding collapses in Copenhagen

In Copenhagen, Denmark on Monday, the first day in the new year, scaffolding at the corner o...

Automotive
Reviews | Technology | Projects & Tuning | Events | Racing
Business & Technology
Business & Economy | Mobile | Internet & Media | Security & Privacy | Gadgets & Tech | Software
Lifestyle
Health, Food & Fitness | Fashion | Gardening | DIY | Homes
Society
Accidents | Crime | Culture | Finance | Politics
Science & Environment
Wildlife | Green | Space
Gaming
Reviews
Society
Accidents | Crime | Culture | Finance | Politics
Travel
MM-iNEWS
Copyright & Privacy | Site Roadmap | Sitemap | Contact
Web Development @ OverHertz Ltd
Ω